An actual run · a synthetic answer
The calculation is wrong. Why did it score 82?
This answer has numbered steps, asks the reader to check the data, and states a limitation. It looks thorough. But the first step gets relative growth wrong.
“conversion rose from 20% to 30%, a relative increase of 10%, according to [1].”
Subtract the starting rate and you get 10 percentage points. Divide that increase by the original 20%, and relative growth is 50%.
(30% − 20%) ÷ 20% = 50%
The tool gave the full English answer 82/100. It asked for sources but did not identify the arithmetic error. [1] has no corresponding reference, yet counted as citation formatting; steps, verification words, and caveats added points.
That is where this checker helps—and where it misses things. It can find text signals; the calculations and citations still need checking.
Read the full answer and recorded output
1. First record the metric: conversion rose from 20% to 30%, a relative increase of 10%, according to [1].
2. Then check the starting and ending values in the file, for example by keeping the original counts and observation window for the same group.
3. Finally state the limitation: these are synthetic numbers, and other groups may differ; verify the denominator and sampling method, and preserve the calculation and source in the report.Answer type: research or factual answer · 2026-09-08 · 82/100
- Some claims need sources — Add sources or soften the wording.
- Add sources, evidence, method boundaries, and uncertainty. — Add sources, evidence, method boundaries, and uncertainty.
This run uses the English original. The Chinese wording scores 73 because the two texts trigger different rules.
Check the numbers and sources before rewriting. Try a percentage exercise →