Build a Personal Style DNA From AI Drafts

Worked example

Task context

A user wants AI help with writing, but the drafts keep becoming too generic. Instead of asking for a vague better tone, extract a personal style DNA from before-and-after edits.

Open the related tool: AI Personal Style DNA Builder

Input and output

Original phrase: 'This feels useful, but it needs to be less slippery.'
AI rewrite: 'This is a practical and effective improvement.'
User correction: 'Useful direction, but still too vague to trust.'
Preference: direct, cautious, concrete, avoids inflated adjectives.

Voice rules:
- Prefer concrete nouns over inflated adjectives.
- Keep caution when evidence is incomplete.
- Use short judgment sentences before details.
- Avoid 'practical and effective' unless the mechanism is named.
Reusable instruction: Rewrite in a direct, cautious, concrete style. Preserve uncertainty and remove generic praise.

Checks before copying

• Use the user's corrections, not only their raw drafts.
• Keep style rules observable and testable.
• Avoid copying private examples into a shared prompt library.
• Review whether the style DNA changes meaning, not only tone.

Lesson: Personal style is easier to preserve when it is written as rules with evidence, not as a mood word.

Keep working